Theology Proper
Creation and Providence
God freely brought the universe into being from nothing and continually sustains and governs it.
The doctrine explained
The doctrine of creation ex nihilo holds that God brought the universe into existence out of nothing, not shaping preexistent matter as in Platonic cosmology, and not out of necessity but by free, sovereign will. Genesis 1:1 and Hebrews 11:3, 'the universe was created by the word of God, so that what is seen was not made out of things that are visible,' are the classic texts. This doctrine distinguishes the Creator absolutely from the creation, denying any eternal co-principle alongside God and grounding the total dependence of everything that exists on God's continuous will.
Providence extends creation into ongoing governance: God does not merely originate the world and withdraw, as in deism, but actively upholds, directs, and governs all things toward his purposes. The Westminster Confession (5.1) speaks of God's 'most wise and holy providence' ordering all creatures, actions, and things, from the greatest to the least, and Colossians 1:17 states that in Christ all things hold together. Providence is traditionally divided into preservation, the sustaining of creatures in existence, and government, the direction of creatures toward their ends.
A key theological distinction is between God's ordinary providence, working through secondary causes such as natural laws, human choices, and creaturely processes, and extraordinary providence or miracle, in which God acts directly to produce effects secondary causes could not produce alone. This distinction allows theologians to affirm both a stable, law-governed created order suitable for scientific investigation and the reality of miraculous divine intervention within that order, notably in the incarnation and resurrection.
The concept of concurrence (concursus) addresses how divine and creaturely causality relate: God is understood to cause every creaturely action to occur, cooperating with the creature's own causal powers, without either reducing the creature to a mere instrument or making God a distant bystander. Aquinas, and later Reformed scholastics, held that God as first cause and creatures as secondary causes both truly cause the same effect at different levels of causal explanation, a position meant to avoid both occasionalism, in which creatures have no real causal power, and deism, in which God has none.
The problem of evil bears directly on providence: if God governs all things, including the free and sinful acts of creatures, in what sense is he not the author of sin? Classical formulations, following Augustine, distinguish God's willing and permitting: God ordains that sinful acts occur (in some strong Reformed formulations) or permits them (in most other traditions) without himself sinning or approving of sin, since he uses evil acts for good ends he does not himself author as evil, as in Joseph's words to his brothers in Genesis 50:20.
Historically, creation ex nihilo was forged partly against Gnostic and Marcionite dualism, which denigrated the material world as the product of an inferior or evil demiurge, and against Greek philosophical accounts of eternal matter. The church's insistence that the same God who redeems also created, and created good, has had enormous downstream consequences for Christian views of the body, the natural world, and the possibility of a good ending to history rather than an escape from a fundamentally flawed cosmos.
Contemporary discussion has been shaped by the dialogue with modern cosmology and evolutionary biology. Big Bang cosmology's implication of a temporal beginning has been read by some as corroborating creation ex nihilo, though theologians caution that ex nihilo is a metaphysical claim about ontological dependence rather than strictly a claim about temporal beginning, since some theologians (following Aquinas, who thought an eternally created universe was not incoherent) hold creation and beginninglessness are not mutually exclusive.
Biblical basis
- Genesis 1:1In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth, foundational creation text.
- Hebrews 11:3The universe was created by the word of God from things not visible, classic ex nihilo proof text.
- Colossians 1:16-17All things were created through and for Christ, and in him all things hold together.
- Psalm 104Extended meditation on God's sustaining providence over creatures and the natural order.
- Job 38-41God's speeches from the whirlwind assert his sovereign governance over creation's mysteries.
- Matthew 10:29Not a sparrow falls apart from the Father, affirming meticulous providence.
- Acts 17:28In God we live and move and have our being, describing ongoing dependence.
- Genesis 50:20Joseph's brothers meant evil, but God meant it for good, key text on providence and evil.
How the wording developed
- c. 180Theophilus of Antioch and later Irenaeus explicitly formulate creation ex nihilo against Gnostic and Middle Platonist dualism.
- c. 400Augustine's Confessions book 11 and City of God develop creation and providence, denying matter's eternity and affirming God's timeless creative act.
- 1265-1274Aquinas's Summa Theologiae distinguishes creation, conservation, concurrence, and government as aspects of the God-world relation.
- 1500sReformation confessions retain creation ex nihilo while intensifying emphasis on providence, especially in Calvin's Institutes book 1.
- 1618-1619The Synod of Dort debates providence and grace in the context of the Arminian controversy, touching on God's governance of the fall.
- 1646The Westminster Confession chapters 4 and 5 give a mature Reformed statement of creation and providence, including preservation, concurrence, and government.
- 1859Darwin's Origin of Species precipitates a long-running theological debate over how evolutionary biology relates to creation doctrine.
- 1927 onwardBig Bang cosmology, from Lemaitre's original proposal, becomes a recurring point of dialogue and sometimes conflation with theological creation ex nihilo.
Misunderstanding vs. the actual claim
Not this: Creation ex nihilo means creation happened a long time ago and God is now uninvolved.
But this: Classical theism pairs ex nihilo creation with ongoing providential sustenance; without continuous divine upholding, creation would cease to exist.
Not this: Providence means everything that happens is directly approved by God as good.
But this: Traditional accounts distinguish God's ordaining or permitting an event from his moral approval of it, especially regarding sin.
Not this: Concurrence means God and the creature share causal credit fifty-fifty like two people pushing a cart.
But this: Concurrence describes two different levels of total causation, primary and secondary, not a division of causal labor.
Not this: Creation ex nihilo is primarily a claim that the universe had a temporal beginning.
But this: It is primarily a claim about ontological dependence on nothing but God's will; a beginningless but still fully dependent universe was considered coherent by Aquinas.
Not this: Belief in miracles requires denying that nature is law-governed.
But this: Most theologians hold nature is genuinely law-governed by God's ordinary providence while affirming God can also act by extraordinary providence.
Where Christians differ
- • Reformed theology tends toward a strong, meticulous providence in which even sinful acts fall under God's ordaining decree, distinguished carefully from divine authorship of sin.
- • Arminian and Wesleyan theology affirms providence but resists formulations that make God the ultimate determiner of free sinful choices, emphasizing God's permission and foreknowledge.
- • Catholic Thomism uses the primary-secondary causation framework to affirm robust providence while preserving genuine creaturely (including free) causal agency.
- • Eastern Orthodox theology tends to speak more in terms of synergy and divine energies at work in creation than in the Western vocabulary of decree and concurrence.
- • Open theists hold a more limited providence, in which God governs by responsive wisdom to a genuinely open future rather than by exhaustive prior ordination.
The hardest question
If God's providence extends to ordaining or at least meticulously permitting every event, including the free acts by which creatures sin, how can God be understood as not ultimately responsible for the existence of moral evil, and does any proposed distinction between ordaining and permitting, or between primary and secondary causation, survive rigorous scrutiny, or does it merely relocate the problem without solving it?
For further study
Primary and secondary sources on both sides of this question. Reading the strongest opposing case is part of the work, not a concession.
The Christian Faith — Michael Horton
A single-volume systematic theology that traces how each doctrine developed and where traditions divide.
The Christian Tradition (5 vols.) — Jaroslav Pelikan
The standard history of doctrinal development, indispensable for seeing when a doctrine was actually formulated.
God Crucified / Jesus and the God of Israel — Richard Bauckham
Shows that the highest Christology appears in the earliest sources, not centuries later.
Early Christian Doctrines — J. N. D. Kelly
Patristic doctrine described from the primary texts; the place to check what the Fathers actually said.